Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Welcome DJI Spark Pilot!
Jump in and join our free Spark community today!
Sign up
Forums
General Forums
sUAV Rules & Regulations
DJI responds to FAA NPRM on Remote ID
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="I B Spectre" data-source="post: 109413" data-attributes="member: 18605"><p>Excellent read, RotorWash. DJI makes its own compelling arguments against the FAA's overreaching proposal, but including other diverse interests' statements clearly shows how major stakeholders are also up in arms. I am relieved DJI made a point of saying that only authorized enforcement entities should be able to access the operator's location and personally identifiable information. As it stands, the NPRM is needlessly complex, privacy invading and very expensive to implement. A simple (see also: reliable), effective, inexpensive solution is at hand if the powers-that-be will recognize it. Otherwise, I see issues ranging from non-compliance to court cases coming down the pike. Thanks for posting, RotorWash, it helps with building an effective NPRM comment.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="I B Spectre, post: 109413, member: 18605"] Excellent read, RotorWash. DJI makes its own compelling arguments against the FAA's overreaching proposal, but including other diverse interests' statements clearly shows how major stakeholders are also up in arms. I am relieved DJI made a point of saying that only authorized enforcement entities should be able to access the operator's location and personally identifiable information. As it stands, the NPRM is needlessly complex, privacy invading and very expensive to implement. A simple (see also: reliable), effective, inexpensive solution is at hand if the powers-that-be will recognize it. Otherwise, I see issues ranging from non-compliance to court cases coming down the pike. Thanks for posting, RotorWash, it helps with building an effective NPRM comment. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Forums
sUAV Rules & Regulations
DJI responds to FAA NPRM on Remote ID