Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Welcome DJI Spark Pilot!
Jump in and join our free Spark community today!
Sign up
Forums
General Forums
sUAV Rules & Regulations
Friday, March 11th, 2022 and the BVLOS saga . . .The ARC Report to the FAA
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BigAl07" data-source="post: 123777" data-attributes="member: 13808"><p>As many of you may already be seeing, yesterday the FAA Released a VERY long report on <strong>UAS BVLOS operation</strong>.</p><p></p><p>First off let me break it down for those who have only seen the headlines.... <strong>we are NOT ALLOWED TO FLY BVLOS without a Waiver right now</strong>. I repeat</p><p></p><p><strong><span style="color: rgb(184, 49, 47)">we are NOT ALLOWED TO FLY BVLOS without a Waiver right now</span></strong></p><p></p><p>This report is merely the<strong> Final Report of the Aviation Rulemaking Committee (ARC) on UAS BVLOS </strong>operation. This is only a committee making recommendations to the FAA. It will take time for the FAA to "digest" this report and then come up with what they want to take from it. Then they will likely, at some point in the future, create a new <strong>Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)</strong> which will then have to go through the long process of Public Comments etc. Once that time period has expired the FAA would then take into account the comments from the Public (or not) and make revisions or possibly start the actual process of actually codifying their final rule. This could be a long process or a VERY long process.</p><p></p><p>If I had to "guess" I would estimate a Final Ruling could be 12-24 months away at best. There are a LOT of variables at play here and it's not going to be easy to say the least.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BigAl07, post: 123777, member: 13808"] As many of you may already be seeing, yesterday the FAA Released a VERY long report on [B]UAS BVLOS operation[/B]. First off let me break it down for those who have only seen the headlines.... [B]we are NOT ALLOWED TO FLY BVLOS without a Waiver right now[/B]. I repeat [B][COLOR=rgb(184, 49, 47)]we are NOT ALLOWED TO FLY BVLOS without a Waiver right now[/COLOR][/B] This report is merely the[B] Final Report of the Aviation Rulemaking Committee (ARC) on UAS BVLOS [/B]operation. This is only a committee making recommendations to the FAA. It will take time for the FAA to "digest" this report and then come up with what they want to take from it. Then they will likely, at some point in the future, create a new [B]Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)[/B] which will then have to go through the long process of Public Comments etc. Once that time period has expired the FAA would then take into account the comments from the Public (or not) and make revisions or possibly start the actual process of actually codifying their final rule. This could be a long process or a VERY long process. If I had to "guess" I would estimate a Final Ruling could be 12-24 months away at best. There are a LOT of variables at play here and it's not going to be easy to say the least. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Forums
sUAV Rules & Regulations
Friday, March 11th, 2022 and the BVLOS saga . . .The ARC Report to the FAA