Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Welcome DJI Spark Pilot!
Jump in and join our free Spark community today!
Sign up
Forums
General Forums
sUAV Rules & Regulations
DJI discusses Drone-to-Phone tech and pilot privacy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="I B Spectre" data-source="post: 110346" data-attributes="member: 18605"><p>As the March 2nd deadline approaches for public comment regarding the FAA's proposals for Remote I.D., a new article appeared in which <a href="https://dronedj.com/2020/02/19/dji-talks-pilot-location-drone-to-phone-and-remote-id/" target="_blank">DJI talks pilot location, drone-to-phone, and remote ID</a></p><p>and they seem to be on the right track.</p><p></p><p>Congress mandated the requirement to remotely identify all UASs, so that part is a done deed. However, the way in which it is implemented is the key to sustaining our hobby and, as DJI points out, the FAA's proposal will be costly, complex and fraught with problems whereas Drone-to-Phone can be quickly and easily employed at little or no cost while providing the mandated information. I particularly like that they have heard our concerns about showing pilot location to anyone other than officials with a need to know. I also like their suggestion that the FAA include wording that would make interfering with a UAS pilot at any stage of flight would be a criminal offense just as it would on board a manned aircraft.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="I B Spectre, post: 110346, member: 18605"] As the March 2nd deadline approaches for public comment regarding the FAA's proposals for Remote I.D., a new article appeared in which [URL='https://dronedj.com/2020/02/19/dji-talks-pilot-location-drone-to-phone-and-remote-id/']DJI talks pilot location, drone-to-phone, and remote ID[/URL] and they seem to be on the right track. Congress mandated the requirement to remotely identify all UASs, so that part is a done deed. However, the way in which it is implemented is the key to sustaining our hobby and, as DJI points out, the FAA's proposal will be costly, complex and fraught with problems whereas Drone-to-Phone can be quickly and easily employed at little or no cost while providing the mandated information. I particularly like that they have heard our concerns about showing pilot location to anyone other than officials with a need to know. I also like their suggestion that the FAA include wording that would make interfering with a UAS pilot at any stage of flight would be a criminal offense just as it would on board a manned aircraft. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Forums
sUAV Rules & Regulations
DJI discusses Drone-to-Phone tech and pilot privacy