Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Welcome DJI Spark Pilot!
Jump in and join our free Spark community today!
Sign up
Forums
General Forums
sUAV Rules & Regulations
FAA (USA) new proposed rules for UAV Remote-ID and location
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="I B Spectre" data-source="post: 107782" data-attributes="member: 18605"><p>I haven't seen anything so far suggesting restricting drones to flying club locations after 3 years. To be fair, I only clicked on the links embedded in the FAA email, so it's possible that I missed something. If you've seen something on this elsewhere, please post a link, we need all the information we can get.</p><p></p><p>We had a good discussion back on November under <a href="https://sparkpilots.com/threads/they-will-find-you-maybe.16389/#post-105787" target="_blank">They will find you (maybe)!</a> and it's a good read. We need to provide thoughtful, constructive input on this to help shape emerging regulations. We cannot afford to do nothing at this pivotal moment.</p><p></p><p>When I posted the above, I did not realize the unpublished document from the Federal Register was available. It's 319 pages long and reads like most government documents being clear as mud. Up to now, most of the references to "FAA recognized identification areas" has pertained to RC clubs located within restricted airspace, so further reading is warranted to clarify. One problem I see is that two of the three methods illustrated in the email are for ways to remotely identify that depend on availability of the internet. We need to make our voices heard when it comes to the realities of flying drones in areas without reliable internet. We also need to press the issue of making our personal I.D. and location unavailable to anyone except the proper authorities with a need to know.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="I B Spectre, post: 107782, member: 18605"] I haven't seen anything so far suggesting restricting drones to flying club locations after 3 years. To be fair, I only clicked on the links embedded in the FAA email, so it's possible that I missed something. If you've seen something on this elsewhere, please post a link, we need all the information we can get. We had a good discussion back on November under [URL='https://sparkpilots.com/threads/they-will-find-you-maybe.16389/#post-105787']They will find you (maybe)![/URL] and it's a good read. We need to provide thoughtful, constructive input on this to help shape emerging regulations. We cannot afford to do nothing at this pivotal moment. When I posted the above, I did not realize the unpublished document from the Federal Register was available. It's 319 pages long and reads like most government documents being clear as mud. Up to now, most of the references to "FAA recognized identification areas" has pertained to RC clubs located within restricted airspace, so further reading is warranted to clarify. One problem I see is that two of the three methods illustrated in the email are for ways to remotely identify that depend on availability of the internet. We need to make our voices heard when it comes to the realities of flying drones in areas without reliable internet. We also need to press the issue of making our personal I.D. and location unavailable to anyone except the proper authorities with a need to know. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Forums
sUAV Rules & Regulations
FAA (USA) new proposed rules for UAV Remote-ID and location