Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Welcome DJI Spark Pilot!
Jump in and join our free Spark community today!
Sign up
Forums
General Forums
sUAV Rules & Regulations
FAA (USA) new proposed rules for UAV Remote-ID and location
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="I B Spectre" data-source="post: 107789" data-attributes="member: 18605"><p>I appreciate your input, SirThomas. I found the "400 feet from its control station" part of the Limited Remote Identification model somewhat disturbing. 51drone was one of the first to make me aware of a proposal by DJI to address the issue in the video posted on the discussion thread. It sounds like DJI is keenly aware how this will impact the industry.</p><p></p><p>Somewhere I recall reading DJI said they could, via software, have existing drones transmit the required information. It might be as simple turning on UUID which is defaulted "on" with the Mavic Enterprise series, but supposedly not "off" in the other models. The costs involved with the Standard Remote ID and possibly with the Limited Remote ID are negatives, IMO, as are the establishment of databases of all drone flights, not just those that might be breaking the rules. Flight by subscription is not what most of us would embrace. I'm always skeptical of organizations that provide contract services that should fall exclusively within the province of the government (i.e. think private prisons).</p><p></p><p>Since, at least at this point, they're excluding UASs under .55 lbs (250 grams), I foresee more Mavic Mini sales along with any comparable designs from others.</p><p></p><p>News outlets are starting to pickup on the proposal. <a href="https://dronelife.com/2019/12/26/breaking-news-faa-announces-proposal-remote-id-for-drones/" target="_blank">FAA announcement on Remote ID</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="I B Spectre, post: 107789, member: 18605"] I appreciate your input, SirThomas. I found the "400 feet from its control station" part of the Limited Remote Identification model somewhat disturbing. 51drone was one of the first to make me aware of a proposal by DJI to address the issue in the video posted on the discussion thread. It sounds like DJI is keenly aware how this will impact the industry. Somewhere I recall reading DJI said they could, via software, have existing drones transmit the required information. It might be as simple turning on UUID which is defaulted "on" with the Mavic Enterprise series, but supposedly not "off" in the other models. The costs involved with the Standard Remote ID and possibly with the Limited Remote ID are negatives, IMO, as are the establishment of databases of all drone flights, not just those that might be breaking the rules. Flight by subscription is not what most of us would embrace. I'm always skeptical of organizations that provide contract services that should fall exclusively within the province of the government (i.e. think private prisons). Since, at least at this point, they're excluding UASs under .55 lbs (250 grams), I foresee more Mavic Mini sales along with any comparable designs from others. News outlets are starting to pickup on the proposal. [URL='https://dronelife.com/2019/12/26/breaking-news-faa-announces-proposal-remote-id-for-drones/']FAA announcement on Remote ID[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Forums
sUAV Rules & Regulations
FAA (USA) new proposed rules for UAV Remote-ID and location