Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Welcome DJI Spark Pilot!
Jump in and join our free Spark community today!
Sign up
Forums
General Forums
sUAV Rules & Regulations
FAA (USA) new proposed rules for UAV Remote-ID and location
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="I B Spectre" data-source="post: 107873" data-attributes="member: 18605"><p>I'm always suspicious of business entities that see emerging services as a cash cow. These USS contractors are interested in making a profit from where ever it can be found such as subscriptions and service fees for accessing flight. </p><p></p><p>DJI has already demonstrated their Aeroscope technology that identifies UAV communication links and provides information on flight status, paths and other information in real-time. It is available as both stationary and portable units. Further, they have demonstrated their direct drone-to-phone app that can remotely identify airborne drones within radio range of the drone and provide location, altitude, speed and direction of the drone as well as an identification number for the drone and location of the pilot. It's that last part that should give pause and we should strongly insist that providing location of the pilot to anyone other than proper authorities with a need-to-know presents a problem with operator privacy and could allow misuse by anyone not legally authorized to know. Seems to me Aeroscope is an elegant, proven, low cost solution that should obviate the need for being restricted to FAA-recognized identification areas. The Stationary and Limited USS approaches smack of high implementation and operation costs.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="I B Spectre, post: 107873, member: 18605"] I'm always suspicious of business entities that see emerging services as a cash cow. These USS contractors are interested in making a profit from where ever it can be found such as subscriptions and service fees for accessing flight. DJI has already demonstrated their Aeroscope technology that identifies UAV communication links and provides information on flight status, paths and other information in real-time. It is available as both stationary and portable units. Further, they have demonstrated their direct drone-to-phone app that can remotely identify airborne drones within radio range of the drone and provide location, altitude, speed and direction of the drone as well as an identification number for the drone and location of the pilot. It's that last part that should give pause and we should strongly insist that providing location of the pilot to anyone other than proper authorities with a need-to-know presents a problem with operator privacy and could allow misuse by anyone not legally authorized to know. Seems to me Aeroscope is an elegant, proven, low cost solution that should obviate the need for being restricted to FAA-recognized identification areas. The Stationary and Limited USS approaches smack of high implementation and operation costs. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Forums
sUAV Rules & Regulations
FAA (USA) new proposed rules for UAV Remote-ID and location