Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Welcome DJI Spark Pilot!
Jump in and join our free Spark community today!
Sign up
Forums
General Forums
sUAV Rules & Regulations
FAA (USA) new proposed rules for UAV Remote-ID and location
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="I B Spectre" data-source="post: 108008" data-attributes="member: 18605"><p>There are less than a handful of YouTube videos discussing this problem, but be sure that will change in the coming days. Our reaction to the FAA proposals are overwhelmingly negative, but we have to stay focused on providing input during the comment period that seeks to persuade the rule makers of the need to accommodate our sector of the issue.</p><p></p><p>Here is a clear presentation of the proposal:<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_b1BlusKt0k" target="_blank"> Pilot Institute comments on FAA proposal</a></p><p>It's somewhat lengthy, but covers the details most important to our needs.</p><p></p><p>I wish we didn't have to deal with this, but ignoring it and failing to submit our concerns to the FAA <strong>and</strong> our U.S. Senators and Congressmen/women leaves us without a voice. Angry responses and threats of non-compliance will not help our cause. We don't have an overarching lobby to represent us in the way the AMA speaks for the RC plane crowd. Big business has the resources to influence policy centered on the furtherance of commerce through drone deliveries.</p><p></p><p>Be thinking about how you intend to respond the rule making request. Once it opens for comment, you have 60 days.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="I B Spectre, post: 108008, member: 18605"] There are less than a handful of YouTube videos discussing this problem, but be sure that will change in the coming days. Our reaction to the FAA proposals are overwhelmingly negative, but we have to stay focused on providing input during the comment period that seeks to persuade the rule makers of the need to accommodate our sector of the issue. Here is a clear presentation of the proposal:[URL='https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_b1BlusKt0k'] Pilot Institute comments on FAA proposal[/URL] It's somewhat lengthy, but covers the details most important to our needs. I wish we didn't have to deal with this, but ignoring it and failing to submit our concerns to the FAA [B]and[/B] our U.S. Senators and Congressmen/women leaves us without a voice. Angry responses and threats of non-compliance will not help our cause. We don't have an overarching lobby to represent us in the way the AMA speaks for the RC plane crowd. Big business has the resources to influence policy centered on the furtherance of commerce through drone deliveries. Be thinking about how you intend to respond the rule making request. Once it opens for comment, you have 60 days. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Forums
sUAV Rules & Regulations
FAA (USA) new proposed rules for UAV Remote-ID and location