Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Welcome DJI Spark Pilot!
Jump in and join our free Spark community today!
Sign up
Forums
General Forums
General Discussions
if not a spark..what?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Der olle Hansen" data-source="post: 116947" data-attributes="member: 20475"><p>><a href="https://sparkpilots.com/threads/what-a-pity-its-just-a-design-project.17745/" target="_blank">This</a>< would have been THE answer ... ?</p><p></p><p>The official replacement though is the Mini, but I think it is NOT.</p><p>The Mini is too different - it is just another type of drone: As the name says It is a small Mavic - no new SPARK.</p><p></p><p>IMHO a "SPARK 2.0" should have:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">an optical facelift like in the link above</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">more flight time (20-30 min)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">more software features like the bigger models</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">higher camera resolution (I do not think, it is really necessary, but "the market" will demand it.)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">nothing that makes the SPARK 2.0 less robust and reliable, therefore no 3rd axis for the gimbal and not foldable.<br /> (The size is compact enough for the backpack.)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">not necessarily under 250 g (those who need that, can choose the Mini), but well under 600 g including RC<br /> (The actual SPARK + battery + RC = 595 g.)</li> </ul></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Der olle Hansen, post: 116947, member: 20475"] >[URL='https://sparkpilots.com/threads/what-a-pity-its-just-a-design-project.17745/']This[/URL]< would have been THE answer ... ? The official replacement though is the Mini, but I think it is NOT. The Mini is too different - it is just another type of drone: As the name says It is a small Mavic - no new SPARK. IMHO a "SPARK 2.0" should have: [LIST] [*]an optical facelift like in the link above [*]more flight time (20-30 min) [*]more software features like the bigger models [*]higher camera resolution (I do not think, it is really necessary, but "the market" will demand it.) [*]nothing that makes the SPARK 2.0 less robust and reliable, therefore no 3rd axis for the gimbal and not foldable. (The size is compact enough for the backpack.) [*]not necessarily under 250 g (those who need that, can choose the Mini), but well under 600 g including RC (The actual SPARK + battery + RC = 595 g.) [/LIST] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Forums
General Discussions
if not a spark..what?