Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Welcome DJI Spark Pilot!
Jump in and join our free Spark community today!
Sign up
Forums
General Forums
General Discussions
iPad Mini
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Scottalmas" data-source="post: 108544" data-attributes="member: 16410"><p>That would be great if that were the case, but I do not believe that to be true. Do you have an authority or source to cite to for that? The proposed reg that I saw says:</p><p></p><p style="text-align: center">* * * </p><p><strong>I. REMOTE IDENTIFICATION OPERATING REQUIREMENTS</strong></p><p>Under the proposed rule, a person operating a UAS in the airspace of the United States would have to meet the remote identification requirements in one of three ways, depending upon the capabilities of the UAS, on or before the 36th month after the effective date of the final rule.</p><p></p><p><strong>A. STANDARD REMOTE IDENTIFICATION UAS</strong></p><p></p><p>For purposes of this proposed rule, a “standard remote identification UAS” is a UAS with remote identification equipment capable of <strong><u>both</u></strong>: (1) Connecting to the internet and transmitting through that internet connection to a Remote ID USS; and (2) <strong><u>broadcasting directly from the unmanned aircraft</u></strong>. Standard remote identification UAS are discussed further in section X.A.1 of this preamble. [Emphasis added]</p><p style="text-align: center"></p> <p style="text-align: center">* * * </p><p></p><p>If your UAS does not meet this standard, your device is considered to have Limited Remote ID capabilities and the unmanned aircraft would be "designed to operate no more than 400 feet from the control station."</p><p></p><p>Under these definitions, I do not believe that my Spark, Mini, Air or Anafi would be permitted to operate without a firmware update that places an imposed, non-unlockable 400 foot geofence around the RC.</p><p></p><p>Absent qualifying as a Standard or Limited RID capable UAS, we'll be constrained to flying only within designated "drone parks."</p><p></p><p>(See <a href="https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/12/31/2019-28100/remote-identification-of-unmanned-aircraft-systems" target="_blank">Remote Identification of Unmanned Aircraft Systems</a>)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Scottalmas, post: 108544, member: 16410"] That would be great if that were the case, but I do not believe that to be true. Do you have an authority or source to cite to for that? The proposed reg that I saw says: [CENTER]* * * [/CENTER] [B]I. REMOTE IDENTIFICATION OPERATING REQUIREMENTS[/B] Under the proposed rule, a person operating a UAS in the airspace of the United States would have to meet the remote identification requirements in one of three ways, depending upon the capabilities of the UAS, on or before the 36th month after the effective date of the final rule. [B]A. STANDARD REMOTE IDENTIFICATION UAS[/B] For purposes of this proposed rule, a “standard remote identification UAS” is a UAS with remote identification equipment capable of [B][U]both[/U][/B]: (1) Connecting to the internet and transmitting through that internet connection to a Remote ID USS; and (2) [B][U]broadcasting directly from the unmanned aircraft[/U][/B]. Standard remote identification UAS are discussed further in section X.A.1 of this preamble. [Emphasis added] [CENTER] * * * [/CENTER] If your UAS does not meet this standard, your device is considered to have Limited Remote ID capabilities and the unmanned aircraft would be "designed to operate no more than 400 feet from the control station." Under these definitions, I do not believe that my Spark, Mini, Air or Anafi would be permitted to operate without a firmware update that places an imposed, non-unlockable 400 foot geofence around the RC. Absent qualifying as a Standard or Limited RID capable UAS, we'll be constrained to flying only within designated "drone parks." (See [URL="https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/12/31/2019-28100/remote-identification-of-unmanned-aircraft-systems"]Remote Identification of Unmanned Aircraft Systems[/URL]) [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Forums
General Discussions
iPad Mini