Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Welcome DJI Spark Pilot!
Jump in and join our free Spark community today!
Sign up
Forums
General Forums
sUAV Rules & Regulations
Kittyhawk's idea
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="I B Spectre" data-source="post: 110197" data-attributes="member: 18605"><p>It's anybody's guess as to who in the FAA chain decided to disregard the recommendations of their own Aviation Rulemaking Committee to go with a broadcast method. Rather than go with a proven capability that is effective and at no cost to the UAS owner, they did what they usually do...go with some expensive, unvetted, unnecessarily complex system. Companies like Kittyhawk and AirMap are expecting a new income stream out of this. As hard as it is, every one of us owes it to ourselves to submit a well thought out comment on what the proposed implementation will do to ALL unmanned aircraft operations. Remote ID is coming since Congress passed the law. IT's how they go about it that will determine our future. We have as much right to use the airspace as Amazon or anybody else, but we've got to fight for it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="I B Spectre, post: 110197, member: 18605"] It's anybody's guess as to who in the FAA chain decided to disregard the recommendations of their own Aviation Rulemaking Committee to go with a broadcast method. Rather than go with a proven capability that is effective and at no cost to the UAS owner, they did what they usually do...go with some expensive, unvetted, unnecessarily complex system. Companies like Kittyhawk and AirMap are expecting a new income stream out of this. As hard as it is, every one of us owes it to ourselves to submit a well thought out comment on what the proposed implementation will do to ALL unmanned aircraft operations. Remote ID is coming since Congress passed the law. IT's how they go about it that will determine our future. We have as much right to use the airspace as Amazon or anybody else, but we've got to fight for it. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Forums
sUAV Rules & Regulations
Kittyhawk's idea