Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Welcome DJI Spark Pilot!
Jump in and join our free Spark community today!
Sign up
Forums
General Forums
General Discussions
Mavic Pro?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Richard Ruckert" data-source="post: 51968" data-attributes="member: 2396"><p>I have both Spark and Mavic Pro. Mavic Pro flies 10X better than Spark, but I have found it very difficult to dial in a camera setting that I like as much as the Spark. If you are making videos of wide open spaces, then a Mavic is a good choice. If you like to film architecture, or events, then Spark is a good choice.</p><p> If I fly 10 times, Spark is used 6 or 7 of those times. It's just easier to use, less invasive (people think it's cute), video looks good straight out of the camera (no color correction, and no color grading in post) and I don't concern myself with crashing the drone. The Spark can take a pounding, the Mavic Pro is far more delicate. If you crash the Mavic Pro, it's probable that the gimbal will be destroyed, and that's another $200 to $350.</p><p>Spark is for everyday people point and shoot</p><p>Mavic is for artists, and yet if that's your desire, go for the phantom 4 advanced, or pro, both of which have a better camera.</p><p>I look forward to a Spark 2/Pro with a 3 axis gimbal, 2.7K, gimbal follow mode in sport mode (as opposed to the horrific FPV), and free form mode in tapfly. Unfortunately, Spark 2/pro may never happen. I know there is Mavic Air, which has all of those features, but I think Spark is more robust, and will be more affordable; especially to replace.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Richard Ruckert, post: 51968, member: 2396"] I have both Spark and Mavic Pro. Mavic Pro flies 10X better than Spark, but I have found it very difficult to dial in a camera setting that I like as much as the Spark. If you are making videos of wide open spaces, then a Mavic is a good choice. If you like to film architecture, or events, then Spark is a good choice. If I fly 10 times, Spark is used 6 or 7 of those times. It's just easier to use, less invasive (people think it's cute), video looks good straight out of the camera (no color correction, and no color grading in post) and I don't concern myself with crashing the drone. The Spark can take a pounding, the Mavic Pro is far more delicate. If you crash the Mavic Pro, it's probable that the gimbal will be destroyed, and that's another $200 to $350. Spark is for everyday people point and shoot Mavic is for artists, and yet if that's your desire, go for the phantom 4 advanced, or pro, both of which have a better camera. I look forward to a Spark 2/Pro with a 3 axis gimbal, 2.7K, gimbal follow mode in sport mode (as opposed to the horrific FPV), and free form mode in tapfly. Unfortunately, Spark 2/pro may never happen. I know there is Mavic Air, which has all of those features, but I think Spark is more robust, and will be more affordable; especially to replace. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Forums
General Discussions
Mavic Pro?