Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Welcome DJI Spark Pilot!
Jump in and join our free Spark community today!
Sign up
Forums
DJI Spark Forums
Spark Discussions
NFZ
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JD4x4" data-source="post: 2213" data-attributes="member: 33"><p>Just got mine this am & batteries are on charge. I'm also just inside the D.C. no-fly zone (at about mile 9.5 or so) and if I can't use it on my property to at least 100-200' in gesture or P mode, I'm seriously thinking about challenging DJI and/or the FAA about it. Anyone inside the D.C NFZ, keep in touch..ok?</p><p></p><p>I read something that I want to follow up on about an old Supreme Court ruling that says a property owner owns the air space above it to roughly 360 feet, and if the govt. wants to use it they must be compensated. Now, I realize that a NFZ is a bit of a different subject, but with the latest court ruling about the FAA not having authority over hobby aircraft, might be room for some reasonable common sense compromises? Just my thoughts so far.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JD4x4, post: 2213, member: 33"] Just got mine this am & batteries are on charge. I'm also just inside the D.C. no-fly zone (at about mile 9.5 or so) and if I can't use it on my property to at least 100-200' in gesture or P mode, I'm seriously thinking about challenging DJI and/or the FAA about it. Anyone inside the D.C NFZ, keep in touch..ok? I read something that I want to follow up on about an old Supreme Court ruling that says a property owner owns the air space above it to roughly 360 feet, and if the govt. wants to use it they must be compensated. Now, I realize that a NFZ is a bit of a different subject, but with the latest court ruling about the FAA not having authority over hobby aircraft, might be room for some reasonable common sense compromises? Just my thoughts so far. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
DJI Spark Forums
Spark Discussions
NFZ