Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Welcome DJI Spark Pilot!
Jump in and join our free Spark community today!
Sign up
Forums
General Forums
sUAV Rules & Regulations
Tech demo of RID
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="I B Spectre" data-source="post: 109045" data-attributes="member: 18605"><p>This is much, much bigger when you realize the proposal affects <strong>every unmanned aerial vehicle </strong>flying in the national airspace...hobby, commercial, film/television industry, news, RC airplanes/helos, state/local agencies, utility companies, agri-business...everybody (military and federal govt. excluded). To track and capture flight data on that many sUASs is mind boggling. The EASA (Europe) came up with a far better, far less egregious solution. The FAA needs to go back to the recommendations of the ARC and build from there. In trying to come up with a single shot at a one-size-fits-all solution, they have created a mess that only the drone delivery companies can smile about.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="I B Spectre, post: 109045, member: 18605"] This is much, much bigger when you realize the proposal affects [B]every unmanned aerial vehicle [/B]flying in the national airspace...hobby, commercial, film/television industry, news, RC airplanes/helos, state/local agencies, utility companies, agri-business...everybody (military and federal govt. excluded). To track and capture flight data on that many sUASs is mind boggling. The EASA (Europe) came up with a far better, far less egregious solution. The FAA needs to go back to the recommendations of the ARC and build from there. In trying to come up with a single shot at a one-size-fits-all solution, they have created a mess that only the drone delivery companies can smile about. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Forums
sUAV Rules & Regulations
Tech demo of RID