Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Welcome DJI Spark Pilot!
Jump in and join our free Spark community today!
Sign up
Forums
General Forums
General Discussions
They will find you (maybe!)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="I B Spectre" data-source="post: 105787" data-attributes="member: 18605"><p>I watched Drone U's interview with Brendan Schulman on this subject and found it very informative <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QI5DWktaQiw&feature=youtu.be" target="_blank">How DJI fulfills Remote ID on Mobile</a> particularly his points on the two proposals on how to accomplish it.</p><p></p><p>First thing to understand is that this Remote ID requirement is government driven in an effort to identify aircraft and users in the NAS. Law enforcement entities such as DOJ, DHS, DOD and others are concerned that inappropriate use of drones has the potential to threaten the safety and welfare of the public. This is not going to go away.</p><p></p><p>Second thing, as a major stakeholder in formulation of this process, DJI has participated in the advisory committees and advocated that the implementation should protect the privacy rights of the sUAV pilot and to do it in such as way as to minimize costs. They have demonstrated what is being called the "WiFi-to-Phone" method outlined in 51drone's video above. Compared to the network based method, it is the least invasive of the two. Network methods would require establishment of a database of users, may require user fees/subscriptions, and may require special equipment to monitor drone activity.</p><p></p><p>Third thing, it has been proposed in the above video and in Mr. Schulman's interview that the location of the pilot could/should be made visible only to the proper authorities with a need to know. Identification of the drone would be similar to getting an automobile's tag number to initiate a complaint. DJI has said software can provide the information without the need for additional hardware.</p><p></p><p>Fourth, the FAA (USA) is expected to open the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in December. This is the prime opportunity for every drone operator to submit carefully thought-out ideas to provide the policymakers with informed information prior to their final decision. One successful effort from doing this was when the original Part 107 rules were being formulated, the proposal was to limit all drone flights to 400 ft. AGL. Persons that saw the need to be able to fly higher for building/roof inspections, tower inspections, etc. were able to convince the FAA of the need to fly higher for specific reasons. The final rule allows Part 107 operators to fly up to 400 ft. above the specific structure. User input is vital, but it needs to be constructive. Simply saying Remote ID is bad and needs to go away is not going to work, so be thinking of your concerns and submit them when the NPRM period is announced.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="I B Spectre, post: 105787, member: 18605"] I watched Drone U's interview with Brendan Schulman on this subject and found it very informative [URL='https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QI5DWktaQiw&feature=youtu.be']How DJI fulfills Remote ID on Mobile[/URL] particularly his points on the two proposals on how to accomplish it. First thing to understand is that this Remote ID requirement is government driven in an effort to identify aircraft and users in the NAS. Law enforcement entities such as DOJ, DHS, DOD and others are concerned that inappropriate use of drones has the potential to threaten the safety and welfare of the public. This is not going to go away. Second thing, as a major stakeholder in formulation of this process, DJI has participated in the advisory committees and advocated that the implementation should protect the privacy rights of the sUAV pilot and to do it in such as way as to minimize costs. They have demonstrated what is being called the "WiFi-to-Phone" method outlined in 51drone's video above. Compared to the network based method, it is the least invasive of the two. Network methods would require establishment of a database of users, may require user fees/subscriptions, and may require special equipment to monitor drone activity. Third thing, it has been proposed in the above video and in Mr. Schulman's interview that the location of the pilot could/should be made visible only to the proper authorities with a need to know. Identification of the drone would be similar to getting an automobile's tag number to initiate a complaint. DJI has said software can provide the information without the need for additional hardware. Fourth, the FAA (USA) is expected to open the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in December. This is the prime opportunity for every drone operator to submit carefully thought-out ideas to provide the policymakers with informed information prior to their final decision. One successful effort from doing this was when the original Part 107 rules were being formulated, the proposal was to limit all drone flights to 400 ft. AGL. Persons that saw the need to be able to fly higher for building/roof inspections, tower inspections, etc. were able to convince the FAA of the need to fly higher for specific reasons. The final rule allows Part 107 operators to fly up to 400 ft. above the specific structure. User input is vital, but it needs to be constructive. Simply saying Remote ID is bad and needs to go away is not going to work, so be thinking of your concerns and submit them when the NPRM period is announced. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Forums
General Discussions
They will find you (maybe!)