Hey all, get this...
I enjoy watching the adventures of a particular paramotor pilot on YT and I asked the question today on his channel about whether or not the paramotors are required by FAA regulation to have transponders attached to their aircraft and here is a response I got from someone...
"Not in the US. They fall under FAR part 103 and are ultralights according to the FAA"
I can't see that the proposed and or pending UAS Remote Identification regulation on drones is in any way fair if any aircraft labeled as "Ultralight" is exempt from having Remote Identification devices attached from those aircraft. And as I also build and fly "Foamie" airplanes that would be under the Remote Identification ruling, this kind of ticks me off. I may be barking up the wrong tree on this but then... maybe not.
I enjoy watching the adventures of a particular paramotor pilot on YT and I asked the question today on his channel about whether or not the paramotors are required by FAA regulation to have transponders attached to their aircraft and here is a response I got from someone...
"Not in the US. They fall under FAR part 103 and are ultralights according to the FAA"
I can't see that the proposed and or pending UAS Remote Identification regulation on drones is in any way fair if any aircraft labeled as "Ultralight" is exempt from having Remote Identification devices attached from those aircraft. And as I also build and fly "Foamie" airplanes that would be under the Remote Identification ruling, this kind of ticks me off. I may be barking up the wrong tree on this but then... maybe not.