Reading about how flimsy the MM is reported to be, I think the Spark is a lot more expensive to build. I don't get the weight issue at all. Maybe in other country's aside from the U.S.I don't understand why DJI didn't just upgrade the Spark design with a new gimbal and larger battery in the first place.
Actually, I'm looking for answers for my son (his English in not good enough yet to participate on the forum). He's 14 years old and had only a no-sensor, no-camera, $100 toy drone. He's been saving up for two years for a Spark. Now with all this hype about the Mini Mavic he's wants the MM. All I want is for him to have the best drone for his money that is also most suitable for a beginner.Just wanted to add my few thoughts. I seriously researched the Mini but have decided its not for me because..
1. It seems too light
2. Build quality compromised ??
3. Lack of sensors
4. No lights on the arms
5. DJI never covered my phone on the DJI Fly app (Samsung J6). I am not getting a new phone for this
6.It would like having an affair outside marriage. Sparky is the mini drone for me (I also have P3 and P4).
7. I will spring for a Mavic Air in April 2020 - it won't however supplant the Spark.
8. That will bring my fleet to 4 - John, Paul, George and Sparky !
As far as I know from reading things about the MM, the low weight is only getting the new pilots out of having to register their drone with the FAA. They still however, have to follow all of the same rules as every other pilot in the US. Canada is a different issue on that but I have no knowledge of their regulations other than that. I don't know what the low weight would cause if the drone goes into atti mode in a high wind. Seems that would cause more flyaways to me.Reading about how flimsy the MM is reported to be, I think the Spark is a lot more expensive to build. I don't get the weight issue at all. Maybe in other country's aside from the U.S.
1. I think the concern of "it seems too light" stems from thinner or less robust materials used to meet the Mini's 249 gram target weight. This could make the Mavic Mini more easily damaged in an incident that a Spark would be better able to withstand.I've read your post and I don't understand:
"1. It seems too light" - why might this be a problem?
"5. DJI never covered my phone on the DJI Fly app (Samsung J6). I am not getting a new phone for this."
Could you please explain? Thanks!
Thank you!1. I think the concern of "it seems too light" stems from thinner or less robust materials used to meet the Mini's 249 gram target weight. This could make the Mavic Mini more easily damaged in an incident that a Spark would be better able to withstand.
5. DJI has, or had, a list of devices (phones & tablets) they said are, or were, compatible with their drones. As many have attested, just because your device may not be on the list does not necessarily mean it won't work. My LG V20 was apparently removed from their list, so I also have an older Samsung Galaxy S6 Edge+ that I use only for flying my Spark in conjunction with the Remote Control. The MM comes with a remote already, therefore the phone/tablet are not necessary for flight, but for FPV and camera work. I hope this helps.
Thanks!As far as I know from reading things about the MM, the low weight is only getting the new pilots out of having to register their drone with the FAA. They still however, have to follow all of the same rules as every other pilot in the US. Canada is a different issue on that but I have no knowledge of their regulations other than that. I don't know what the low weight would cause if the drone goes into atti mode in a high wind. Seems that would cause more flyaways to me.
Can't help with the limited battery life or the camera rez, but an OTG cable will likely cure the wifi to controller reliability issue.I ordered my Mavic Mini two days ago, but I will keep my Spark for now for limited use occasions. I never liked the... unreliable wifi to the controller...
Most likely a plus from the gimbal yaw axis. Thinking about it, I can see where pitch stabilization would damp nose up/down and roll stab would keep the horizon level (in Follow Me), but I can't really see where the yaw axis contributes much other than to keep the image centered during very minor yaw oscillations. If it did much more, it would be like being in FPV mode thus not getting roll compensation. The 3-axis gimbal could also allow more responsiveness for that reason. DJI may have downtuned responsiveness in the Spark to smooth out undesirable yaw coupled motion in the 2-axis design.The Spark feel like it moseys along and is less responsive, whereas the Mini cuts curves and stops with a tighter feel. YMMV.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.